E-commerce, Creator & Digital Businesses · Seller readiness
Selling a Marketplace Brand Portfolio / Aggregator business
Published · Reviewed by The Diligence Standard Team · Updated
An aggregator seller should prepare brand-level P&Ls, acquisition bridges, inventory, channel/platform concentration, shared-service allocations, supplier overlap, IP and evidence that central operations genuinely improve economics.
How the business works
A portfolio aggregator is only as strong as its consolidated contribution margin, brand-level concentration, inventory, shared overhead, platform exposure, acquisition accounting and the operational synergies that actually exist.
Issues to resolve
- Consolidated EBITDA hides weak brands is not quantified before a buyer controls the timetable
- Same platform risk across portfolio is explained verbally instead of supported with platform or operating evidence
- Acquisition add-backs are aggressive creates transferability uncertainty that can reduce price or change terms
- Revenue is emphasized more than contribution margin, retention and cash conversion
- Critical accounts, creative assets, data, IP or supplier relationships are not mapped for transfer
- The owner waits until buyer diligence to separate personal influence from transferable enterprise value
Evidence to request and reconcile
- Brand-level P&Ls
- Acquisition/earnout schedules
- Inventory by brand
- Platform/channel reports
- Shared payroll/overhead
- Supplier spend
- IP/trademark portfolio
- Central operating KPIs
Decision questions
- Which brands create most EBITDA?
- What brands would be unprofitable standalone?
- How much platform risk is actually diversified?
- What overhead is required after closing?
- What inventory is impaired?
- Which supplier exposures repeat across brands?
- What acquisition liabilities remain?
- Can central operations run without founder?